
DNA Synthesis in 2025: Technologies, Trends, and Tips
|
|
Time to read 9 min
|
|
Time to read 9 min
DNA synthesis no longer requires a template: your design starts digitally.
Technology platforms affect cost, fidelity, and turnaround time.
Providers vary widely in their capabilities and project suitability.
Complex designs often fail due to repetitive or unstable regions.
DNA synthesis, or gene synthesis, has transitioned from a niche offering to a foundational capability across synthetic biology, molecular diagnostics, and biopharma. As it becomes faster, more affordable, and widely available, understanding how gene synthesis works—and what makes certain sequences harder to manufacture—is increasingly valuable.
This article covers the current state of DNA synthesis: how it's performed, how key providers compare, and how to design DNA with synthesis success in mind. Whether you're planning a new construct or troubleshooting a failed order, these insights can help you streamline your workflow.
Need help synthesizing complex plasmid sequences?
Sign up for our plasmid design service and let our experts guide you. We specialize in optimizing sequences and delivering ready-to-go plasmids.
Gene synthesis typically follows a multi-step pipeline:
Unlike PCR or cloning, most modern DNA synthesis techniques do not require a physical DNA template—the reaction begins with nucleoside precursors or protected nucleotides and a design file, not existing DNA. In phosphoramidite and array-based methods, synthesis proceeds one base at a time on a solid surface without a DNA template. In enzymatic synthesis, template-free polymerases add nucleotides in a controlled fashion. However, some assembly methods like Polymerase Cycling Assembly (PCA) do require oligonucleotide templates that are assembled via overlapping sequences during PCR.
While this means entirely novel sequences can be built from scratch, it doesn't guarantee all sequences are equally buildable. High GC content, strong secondary structure, and repetitive elements can still hinder success. Additionally, longer sequences are often synthesized in segments and must be assembled either by the provider or by the researcher.
For genes longer than 1 kb, most providers deliver the final product in plasmid format. This makes careful plasmid design critical—both for synthesis compatibility and downstream expression. Modular plasmid architectures that follow synthesis-friendly rules can reduce failure rates, simplify assembly, and support flexible re-use in future builds.
Most gene synthesis still begins with the chemical or enzymatic creation of short DNA fragments known as oligonucleotides, or oligos.
This chemical method sequentially adds protected nucleotide bases to a growing DNA strand bound to a solid support. Each cycle involves coupling, oxidation, capping, and deprotection steps. It's precise and produces high-fidelity oligos up to ~200 bp, but its sequential nature limits throughput. Although solid-phase phosphoramidite chemistry is standard today, oligos were historically synthesized in liquid-phase reactions, which offered higher yields for some applications but were more labor-intensive and less scalable.
Here, thousands of oligos are synthesized in parallel on a silicon or glass chip. Photolithographic or inkjet-based methods remove protective groups with light, allowing selective nucleotide addition. While it excels in scale and cost for libraries, it requires post-synthesis amplification and purification due to higher error rates.
This emerging technique uses engineered DNA polymerases or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) to add nucleotides one at a time in a controlled, template-free manner. By engineering the enzymes and controlling nucleotide addition with reversible terminators, enzymatic synthesis aims to improve speed, reduce environmental hazards from chemical reagents, and allow longer or more complex sequences to be built.
After oligonucleotides are synthesized, they must be assembled into full-length genes.
Common methods include Gibson Assembly, which uses exonuclease, polymerase, and ligase to join overlapping DNA fragments in a "one-pot" isothermal reaction. It is well suited for modular designs, allowing seamless assembly of multiple fragments for complex constructs. Golden Gate Assembly uses Type IIS restriction enzymes and ligase to join DNA pieces with precise, seamless overhangs, making it ideal for standardized part assembly and combinatorial libraries.
➡️ We previously explored techniques for modular plasmid assembly more closely.
Traditional ligation-based assembly relies on sticky or blunt-end ligation and is generally best for simple constructs where only one or two fragments are being joined.
Polymerase cycling assembly (PCA) is another approach that employs repeated PCR cycles to assemble overlapping oligos into full-length genes. While it is accessible and commonly used in academic settings, it is more error-prone and typically requires downstream correction steps or additional assembly stages for larger constructs.
To improve synthesis fidelity, error correction steps may be applied before or after assembly. These can include enzymatic treatments that recognize and remove mismatches, or deep sequencing followed by selection of correctly synthesized variants. Some workflows integrate high-throughput screening to verify construct integrity.
Assembly and error correction steps have a direct impact on synthesis success. Longer sequences, repetitive motifs, or extreme GC content can lead to increased failure rates or extended turnaround times. Understanding the limits of each synthesis workflow enables more reliable and predictable construct design.
Synthetic biology increasingly requires modified bases or backbones:
Not all providers support these modifications, and custom synthesis often incurs longer lead times and higher costs. Vendors may require consultation for modified or chemically sensitive designs.
DNA and gene synthesis providers screen submitted sequences to ensure biosafety and compliance:
This screening can delay turnaround or result in rejection of certain sequences. Researchers should anticipate delays when working with pathogen-related genes or sequences derived from regulated organisms.
While many companies offer gene synthesis services, not all use the same technology or excel in the same applications. The table below compares four key players in 2025.
Provider |
Core Synthesis Tech |
Strengths |
Limitations |
Best For |
Twist |
Silicon-based array synthesis |
High-throughput; cost-effective for bulk orders; modular parts |
Limited support for complex/repetitive sequences; batching adds lead time |
Large gene libraries; standardized designs |
GenScript |
Phosphoramidite chemistry |
High success with long or difficult sequences; plasmid services |
Slower delivery for complex builds; higher cost for small runs |
Complex or high-GC genes; ready-to-clone plasmids |
IDT |
Phosphoramidite chemistry |
Fast turnaround; strong QC; competitive pricing for small genes |
Length and sequence complexity constraints |
Short-to-moderate sequences for R&D |
Ansa |
Enzymatic synthesis (pre-commercial) |
Designed for high-fidelity; handles repetitive or toxic motifs |
Still in limited use; potentially higher cost |
Problematic or error-prone sequences |
Other emerging companies—like DNA Script, Codex DNA (BioXp), and Evonetix—are focused on benchtop and automated synthesis systems, which may play a bigger role in lab-scale or distributed synthesis in the near future.
Before you submit a DNA sequence for synthesis, make sure it's truly synthesis-ready. Here are a few quick reminders:
👉 See our in-depth guides on Codon Optimization, DNA Design Tools, and Common Mistakes in Plasmid Design for more tips.
While DNA synthesis has advanced rapidly, several hurdles remain:
Several exciting frontiers are reshaping what DNA synthesis can do:
DNA synthesis is more powerful and accessible than ever—but success still depends on good design and the right provider. By understanding how synthesis works and what makes some sequences harder to build, researchers can avoid costly delays and failed constructs.
GenoCAD supports the design of modular, synthesis-ready plasmids. Whether you're building a new expression system or troubleshooting a failed sequence, we can help you get it right the first time.
Need help synthesizing complex sequences? Our team of plasmid experts is ready to assist. Reach out today to streamline your research.
GenScript Gene Synthesis Handbook
Enzymatic DNA Synthesis: Going to Great Lengths
NIST: Biosecurity for Synthetic Nucleic Acid Sequences
Review: DNA synthesis technologies to close the gene writing gap
Gene synthesis does not require a DNA template and builds genes de novo, while PCR cloning amplifies existing DNA sequences.
Sequences with high GC content, secondary structures, or repeats are often problematic for synthesis platforms.
For standard constructs, 5–10 business days is typical, but complex sequences or long builds may take several weeks.
No, each has strengths depending on your project's needs—simple vs. complex sequences, single genes vs. libraries, etc.
You can, but synthesis success improves when sequences are optimized for vendor constraints. GenoCAD helps streamline this process.